It’s with great hesitation a journalist enters the fray of abortion debate. We don’t take it lightly, we don’t do it for shock value, it doesn’t sell newspapers.
Discussing abortion makes people angry on both sides of the issue.
Leave it to Premier Dalton McGuinty to pick the scab off this old wound by pressing PC Leader Tim Hudak to clarify his position on public funding for abortion.
Hudak admitted he may have signed a petition calling for an end to public health abortion, but he clarified it’s not part of the PC agenda or platform as he prepares to unseat McGuinty’s Grits. Case closed, for now, and McGuinty didn’t gain any political ground. In fact, with McGuinty being a Catholic and his wife being a Catholic school teacher, I’d argue that slinging abortion mud reduced his own political foundation a wee bit — if that’s possible.
Earlier this month, in North Bay, a group of anti-abortionists raised a stir by lining a couple major city streets with protesters holding posters of abortions in progress or the results thereof. You’ve seen the photos before, it happens every year, sometimes more often than that. It’s hard to hold down lunch after running a visual gauntlet of blood.
There was outrage, as usual, from parents upset their children were exposed to such disgusting illustrations of reality. Keep your religious and political campaign where it belongs, no need to shock kids while you’re trying to make a point.
Defenders of publicly funded abortion argue it’s a woman’s right to decide what happens within her body and there’s justifiable reasons for abortions. Providing them as part of the health care system was a battle won over decades with legal and moral rationale tried and tested.
Protecting the physical health of a woman and killing a doomed child as quickly as possible is merciful, they say. Considering how we treat our fellow humans when they’re alive and kicking, I support the concept of abortion in those instances. The majority of people do.
Turning back the clock to debate those points is a waste of time and energy. Saying only God can kill and punish, that we sheep can’t make such decisions, is every person’s right. Forcing others to believe the same only leads to more war and suffering.
Do I believe abortion for convenience should be publicly funded? Should impregnated females have to pay for lifestyle cosmetic alterations? If so, would they seek cheaper and more dangerous blackmarket, backstreet options? Is forcing a woman to bring a baby to term ultimately good for either the woman, baby or society?
No. Yes. Yes. No. It seems we always return to the point where we started. Taking away an individual’s right to make big decisions puts the result back on the lap of society . . . and we don’t take care of that responsibility well enough. There’s already thousands of children dealing with the fact nobody wants them because they’re a burden and an anchor.
It’s not right, it’s not nice. But unless society is prepared to raise every child as if it’s their own, keep your noise out of other people’s business.
And the next time you see the anti-abortion zealots waving their placards to shock you into thinking about their point of view . . . just give your kid a hug and you’ll achieve more good for society than any religion or political party.
-30-