Archive for April, 2012

An electrifying post on lost Taser cartridges

- April 12th, 2012

(Have you seen me?)Although it doesn’t happen with enough frequency to cause too much alarm, Winnipeg cops continue to lose the cartridges for their Tasers.

Police have disclosed four missing cartridges in the last 10 months.

That follows four getting lost over an eight-month period in 2010 and a promise of review of what was happening (see link).

The reported loss of one this week reminded me I had asked Chief Keith McCaskill about it early last year during a media sit-down but never wrote about what he said. (I believe this was May 2011).

Here’s his take on the Taser-cart problem, for the record:

What’s with the Taser cartridges falling off?

“It’s a good question — I’ve been asking that too. It’s an equipment issue, they’ve changed the equipment issue. After a while, there’s wear …

There’s wear, getting in and out and they disengage. And we’ve been talking to training (division) and all that stuff and coming up with better plans and so on. Because that’s where it is.

Because every time I see one. I think, ‘it shouldn’t be happening.’ And that’s the issue. It’s an equipment issue.

Is it happening when they [officers] get out of cars, on pursuits?

I guess at different times either gets pulled off — it’s an equipment issue to make sure it doesn’t happen, looking at different types of equipment to ensure that it doesn’t happen. But it has.

And so you’ve got either pouches wearing, or letting go or things like that. And it’s — if you look at the equipment that our officers are wearing, if … the belt they’ve got and all these — like a utility belt, like Batman

[Voice in background: '23 pounds']

Yeah. And they’re bumping things and banging things and things like that and that’s what’s happening.

(Another reporter) Is this an isolated issue here in Winnipeg?

No … It’s wearing on equipment, banging into things, things like that and all of a sudden … but we’re constantly looking at something better.

Because you think of all the officers that have been wearing these for years and most cases it doesn’t happen. But again, it’s a banging … a wearing on the pouch. You’ve got to be on top of these things and we’ve got to look at better equipment so hopefully it will last longer.

There’s no one thing the same, but it seems like, I don’t know, we’ve had four to five in the last while. One is too many. But that’s what it is.

We automatically report it because, I mean look — we look silly but we have to do that.

So it’s an equipment issue that you’re working to solve, or have solved? 

Well we thought we were solving it, and then something else happens. We keep … it’s banging into things, it’s all those things that occur.

And if, for instance, I was wearing my gun belt I couldn’t fit in this chair … and so you sit down, you might sit in a restaurant and boom, bang, and it’s gone. It’s the banging and thumping and all that stuff.

Or wrestling with somebody you’re arresting and all of a sudden you don’t realize it’s gone until a couple hours later. Because you should be aware of what you’re wearing all the time, but y’know, after a period of time you don’t think about it, right? And all of a sudden it’s gone and you don’t know where it is.

-30-

Looks like there’s still some work to be done.

By my count, cops have disclosed the loss of Taser cartridges 11 times since Oct 27, 2006.

Why is it that we don’t hear similar reports out of Manitoba’s RCMP?

I can’t think of one time Mounties have reported a lost cartridge.

Could be they do less wrestling and running than their WPS counterparts. Who knows.

An electrifying post on WPS losing Taser cartridges

- April 12th, 2012

(Generic Taser cartridge)

Although it doesn’t happen with enough frequency to cause too much alarm, Winnipeg cops continue to lose the cartridges for their Tasers.

Police have disclosed four missing cartridges in the last 10 months.

That follows four getting lost over an eight-month period in 2010 and a promise of review of what was happening (see link).

The reported loss of one this week reminded me I had asked Chief Keith McCaskill about it early last year during a media sit-down but never wrote about what he said. (I believe this was May 2011).

Here’s his take on the Taser-cart problem, for the record:

What’s with the Taser cartridges falling off?

“It’s a good question — I’ve been asking that too. It’s an equipment issue, they’ve changed the equipment issue. After a while, there’s wear …

There’s wear, getting in and out and they disengage. And we’ve been talking to training (division) and all that stuff and coming up with better plans and so on. Because that’s where it is.

Because every time I see one. I think, ‘it shouldn’t be happening.’ And that’s the issue. It’s an equipment issue.

Is it happening when they [officers] get out of cars, on pursuits?

I guess at different times either gets pulled off — it’s an equipment issue to make sure it doesn’t happen, looking at different types of equipment to ensure that it doesn’t happen. But it has.

And so you’ve got either pouches wearing, or letting go or things like that. And it’s — if you look at the equipment that our officers are wearing, if … the belt they’ve got and all these — like a utility belt, like Batman

[Voice in background: '23 pounds']

Yeah. And they’re bumping things and banging things and things like that and that’s what’s happening.

(Another reporter) Is this an isolated issue here in Winnipeg?

No … It’s wearing on equipment, banging into things, things like that and all of a sudden … but we’re constantly looking at something better.

Because you think of all the officers that have been wearing these for years and most cases it doesn’t happen. But again, it’s a banging … a wearing on the pouch. You’ve got to be on top of these things and we’ve got to look at better equipment so hopefully it will last longer.

There’s no one thing the same, but it seems like, I don’t know, we’ve had four to five in the last while. One is too many. But that’s what it is.

We automatically report it because, I mean look — we look silly but we have to do that.

So it’s an equipment issue that you’re working to solve, or have solved? 

Well we thought we were solving it, and then something else happens. We keep … it’s banging into things, it’s all those things that occur.

And if, for instance, I was wearing my gun belt I couldn’t fit in this chair … and so you sit down, you might sit in a restaurant and boom, bang, and it’s gone. It’s the banging and thumping and all that stuff.

Or wrestling with somebody you’re arresting and all of a sudden you don’t realize it’s gone until a couple hours later. Because you should be aware of what you’re wearing all the time, but y’know, after a period of time you don’t think about it, right? And all of a sudden it’s gone and you don’t know where it is.

-30-

Looks like there’s still some work to be done.

By my count, cops have disclosed the loss of Taser cartridges 11 times since Oct 27, 2006.

Why is it that we don’t hear similar reports out of Manitoba’s RCMP?

I can’t think of one time Mounties have reported a lost cartridge.

Could be they do less wrestling and running than their WPS counterparts. Who knows.


Manitoba’s mental health court sits May 10

- April 4th, 2012

It was many, many moons ago that the NDP declared there would be a provincial mental health court in Manitoba. Nearly a decade has passed.

From the WFP 6/11/2011: By Mary Agnes Welch

It was 2004 when then-Justice Minister Gord Mackintosh first said a mental health court was in the works.

“We’re of the view that if we’re going to have a successful mental health court we have to develop this slowly and sure-footedly,” he told the Free Press at the time.

“Slowly” turned into seven years. Last week, the province announced the court would finally launch this winter.

Selinger said it took time to do proper due diligence and planning on things like the mental health court to get them to a workable point.

“We put it in the throne speech last fall and we did it this spring,” said Selinger of the mental health court. “That’s a pretty fast turnaround.”

But, according to a judicial memo circulated today, we can all mark May 10, 2012 on our calendars as the day the shiny new MHC will sit for the first time.

Re: MENTAL HEALTH COURT 

Effective Thursday May 10, 2012, Mental Health Court (MHC) will sit weekly on Thursdays at 1 p.m. in courtroom 408, 408 York Avenue, Winnipeg Manitoba.

This problem-solving court will hear matters where the accused’s involvement with the criminal justice system is a result of mental health issues and there the particulars of the incident(s) fall within the sets of criteria established by the Crown and the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority’s Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) team.

PROCESS: 

Persons with mental health issues who have been or are about to be charged with an offence may be identified to the Crown by police, courts or corrections staff or counsel.

In these cases, the Crown will review the file and may refer the accused to the FACT team for a suitability and amenability assessment. Counsel may assist the accused in filing an application for and amenability assessment. Counsel may assist the accused in filing an application form and the required waiver form. Provided the accused is a suitable candidate for MHC and willing to participate, the FACT team will prepare a report to the MHC judge which will include a treatment plan. This process constitutes application to Mental Health Court.

Until an accused applies for MHC, the charges will be remanded on the pre-trial coordinator’s dockets. Upon application, the accused with appear for the first time on the MHC docket as arranged by counsel with court staff. The accused will enter guilty pleas, file application and waiver forms and enter into a bail as agreed upon by all parties. The charges will then be remanded week to week while the accused’s mental health is addressed during the treatment plan.

Each Thursday at 12 p.m. the MHC judge will meet with the FACT team and counsel in Judges’ chambers to discuss the treatment progress of each person on the docket. During the court sitting as the Crown calls each matter the MHC judge will address the named accused directly to encourage ongoing commitment.

As each accused’s mental health improves, appearances may become less frequent. Upon the treatment plan being completed, the accused will make a final appearance before the MHC judge either to be sentenced to a community based disposition or for the Crown to stay the charges.

The entire process is expected to take 18-24 months from referral to disposition.

ISSUED By Chief Judge Ken Champagne, Provincial Court of Manitoba

Over the past few months I had heard rumblings this would be happening, but like many, I’m sure, had no idea when.

The only other thing I had heard is that the Crown prosecutor who will be running the show is Susan Helenchilde, who is leaving community prosecutions to take this on.

The first Mental Health Court started in 1998 in Toronto, putting us well behind the curve in terms of time — that’s also allowed (hopefully) Manitoba to gain from the knowledge MHC’s in other jurisdictions have only gleaned through trial (pun intended) and error.

It’s interesting to note that in Toronto’s system, there’s a wide range of offences that aren’t eligible for MHC (below).

We’ll obviously learn in coming days what’s permissible for MHC in Manitoba.

I’d also highly recommend reading the “factors to consider” section of the Toronto MHA website. It’s also clear that Manitoba’s taking a bit of a ‘baby-step’ approach by electing (as per the memo above) to not stay charges until the treatment plan is completed.

Geeks can read stats analysis and other research topics on MHC’s here at Stats Can. (Like the court, your tax dollars paid for it, may as well read it.)

3. Eligibility of Offences

    • a. Offences that are not eligible (also known as Class III for purposes of other practice memoranda)

The following classes of offences will not be eligible for treatment plans or supervisory programs as an alternative to prosecution, regardless of the circumstances of the alleged offence or the accused:

      • murder, manslaughter, infanticide, criminal negligence causing death;
      • causing death or bodily harm by dangerous or impaired driving;
      • any offence causing serious bodily harm;
      • simple impaired driving or driving with a prohibited blood alcohol concentration;
      • offences involving firearms;
      • criminal organization offences;
      • kidnapping;
      • spouse/partner offences
      • child abuse;
      • offences involving child pornography
      • sexual offences including sexual assault, interference and exploitation, invitation to sexual touching and incest;
      • specific hate offences
      • home invasions;
      • perjury;