Grant Rants

Author Archive

Scientists are awesome!!

- May 13th, 2013

Greetings web denizens, heathens, zealots and the rest of you!

Just a couple videos for your entertainment, highlighting the recent awesome of scientists Commander Chris Hadfield and his music video from the ISS and biologist Richard Dawkins awesome Hitchslapesque comment on the utility of the scientific method.

Canadian Space Oddity

 

Science works…bitches.

Boxing round up: Mayweather romp, Pac-man is back and Bute’s hand

- May 8th, 2013

Greetings fight fans;

It’s been a busy few days in the world of boxing, so I’m here to catch you up.

Easy night for Mayweather

WEN_wenn20318931

Mayweather had an easy night beating the “Ghost” Guerrero.

Floyd Mayweather Jr., regarded by most as the best pound-for-pound fighter in the world had an easy night Saturday against his highly religious opponent, aggressive southpaw Robert Guerrero. He walked to a 12 round decision without ever being in danger. I scored the bout 199-109 for Money May. I could have given him all 12 rounds, but I scored the 12th for Guerrero, mostly because he did not look as horrible as he did in the preceding 11. Some analysts scored the first couple of rounds for Guerrero, but to my eye while they were closer than most of the others, they were clearly Mayweather rounds.

Where Miguel Cotto was able to pressure Mayweather, keep a good jab in Mayweather’s face (which seems a critical factor in making a fight of it with Money) and was able to make the most of it when Mayweather retreated to the ropes, Guerrero really had nothing. No jab. No pressure. No game plan. He was hit by so many right hand leads (normally a dangerous punch because a fighter can see a right hand coming much easier than a jab, which is typically faster and nearer to the opponent) that Mayweather actually hurt his hand on Guerrero’s hard head.

At this point, short of resurgence Manny Pacquiao actually getting into the ring with Mayweather, it’s hard to see anyone having a shot at defeating Mayweather. All eyes are focused on Saul “Canelo” Alvarez as Mayweather’s next real test, but as good as Canelo is (and he is) he seems tailor made for the  defensive genius of Mayweather.

Bute’s out

JDQ_BRUBUT20130423_28

Lucian Bute

In what would have been perhaps the biggest fight in Canadian history and very likely the biggest sporting event in Canada of 2013 (short of a Canadian team making it to the Stanley Cup finals) former super-middle weight champion Lucian Bute was to face former light-heavy weight champ Jean Pascal in Montreal. Both men were once among the best in the world until recently losses cost them their titles and neither man has challenged for a title since. The Canadian super fight, which was to be broadcast by HBO, would likely put the winner back into title contention while the other would probably fade to black. The stakes were as high as they get for professional fighters.

But Bute announced this week he hurt his hand in training and will need surgery. The fight will be rescheduled, although a new date has yet to be set.

The return of Pacman

RE_2012_05_31T021121Z_01_LOA004_RTRMDNP_3_USA_PACQUIAO

Manny Pacquiao

Manny Pacquiao’s first fight since his stunning KO loss to long time rival Juan Manuel Marquez is scheduled for November in China against American Brandon Rios, also a left handed slugger.

On the one hand it’s a risky fight for Pacman. Rios is a power hitter with no quit in him who likes to pressure fighters into submission. He’s young and hungry  and eager to come back after a recent loss to Mike Alvarado. On the other hand, come forward pressure fighters almost always get chewed up in the Pacquiao buzzsaw. Think Ricky Hatton, a skilled powerful brawler who was dispatched in brutal fashion in two short rounds.

A lot is being said about Pacman’s state of mind. Will he be gun-shy after JMM knocked him out? If Pacman is in top form (and lets not forget he was winning his fight against JMM and pretty well beating him up until he walked into a perfectly timed right hand counter from Marquez, arguably the best counter puncher in boxing) I don’t see the slower, less mobile Rios making it past 7 rounds. Rios is good but he is no Mayweather or Marquez.  Rios could not adapt to Alvarado’s more mobile style. It is hard to imagine how he will cope with the lightning feet and hands of Pacman.

I get feedback: I’m a traitor to the nation for criticizing Grapes edition

- May 5th, 2013

Greetings web denizens, heathens, zealots and the rest of you!

So my latest Rant about Don Cherry’s cave man idea about barring female reporters from NHL locker rooms has struck a nerve with many readers, most of them rising to the defense of Grapes, some missing the point entirely and a few setting a new standard for the burning stupid.

Several readers, whom I cannot help but picture twirling a mustache while shouting “Ah ha! Gotcha LaFleche!” commented that women should not be allowed in NHL locker rooms since men are not allowed to do post game interviews with female athletes in their locker rooms. Well, sorry to break it to you fellas, but male reporters do post game interviews for females sports from the locker room all the time. It is a regular occurrence, for instance, in the WNBA.

There is a general theme among those who commented on the Rant that there will be naked bodies in the locker room and reporters who are in there are either there to be peeping toms or will be shattered mentally should they witness the naked human form. Letting women in NHL locker rooms is an affront to basic decency, they say. Let a male reporter into a female locker room post game just goes too far! Soon, reporters will be asking for access to the bathrooms, says one reader.

Well the problem here is that interviews are not conducted in the shower stalls, and where the players get undressed and cleaned up etc. is, in modern NHL locker rooms, kept separate from the area that reporters get access too. Things have changed a lot since Cherry was an NHL coach. Yah, there will from time to time be a player in a towel and a naked butt seen, but by in large, it’s a non-issue. There will, of course, be the occasional moron who acts like  pig, but that player needs to be called out for that sort of behavior rather that barring the female reporter from doing her job. Which is the point. The problem isn’t the reporter, the problem is a minority of players who act like idiots.

Some readers trying to be fair want reporters, men and women, out of the locker room entirely. Yet the reason that reporters champ at the bit to get into the locker rooms is because news outlets work on tight deadlines. Getting post game reaction quickly has been a staple of coverage for decades. Reporters might have 30 minutes or so to get interviews done, finish a story and send it to their editors. The relationship between NHL teams and reporters has been built on this arrangement for ages and there really isn’t any outcry or need to change it.

Others still say by criticizing Cherry, I’m being “politically correct” and if Cherry’s politics were left of centre instead of right, no columnist would say a peep about his idea of kicking female journalists out of the locker room. Poppycock. As I have noted before, I pretty well take aim and everyone at some point or another, and usually when that happens, I am labeled as a supporter of the other side. Criticize a liberal, I’m a conservative. A conservative, I’m a liberal and so on. The fact of the matter is that if anyone, Liberal or Tory, came out and said female journalists should be barred from doing their jobs, I’d have written exactly the same thing.

Finally, there is a comment that is perhaps the most bizarre feedback I have ever received. By criticizing what Cherry said, we’re told, I am merely a puppet of my university professors. (I was unaware the political studies department at Bishop’s University was so focused on the conduct of female sports reporters and the athletes they cover. I must have missed that course.) And in fact by speaking up for the right of my peers to do their jobs I am attempting to transform Canada into communist China. Apparently, criticism of Don Cherry is evidence of being a Marxist and therefore, makes me a traitor to the nation who seeks to destroy families. I’d explain that further, but frankly it doesn’t make sense to me either.

The bottom line is that Cherry was wrong. Reporters, male and female, have a job to do and preventing them doing it on the basis of gender is discriminatory nonsense.

Lennox Lewis on Mayweather vs. Guerrero

- May 2nd, 2013

Greetings fight fans!

One of the amazing things about being a reporter is that, on occasion, one gets to interview people you admire. Such was the for me last week when I did a telephone interview with former heavyweight champion (in my view, the last great heavyweight champ) Lennox Lewis.

The primary reason for talking to Lewis is because he, along with a St. Catharines surgeon, is receiving an award next week for charity work they do in the southern hemisphere. (That story will appear in the Standard next week.)

RTRMDNP_3_BOXING_STEWARD

Lennox Lewis

But it would be impossible not to interview about the former Canadian Olympic gold medalist without talking some boxing.

Pound-for-pound king Floyd Mayweather Jr. is returning to the ring this Saturday against Robert “The Ghost” Guerrero in Vegas.  I asked Lewis who he thinks is the favorite to win.

“Oh Mayweather, definitely Floyd,” Lewis said in an interview from Jamaica. “He is just too skilled for Guerrero.”

The expectation in the boxing press is that Guerrero won’t be ghostly at all, but will try to stay in Mayweather’s face all night, rough him up, and turn the bout into an ugly war of attrition like he did against Andre Berto.  Lewis, however, believes that Guerrero won’t be able to keep pace with with the slick Mayweather, a defensive genius who has not lost in more than 40 professional fights.

“It’s like a dance,” Lewis says. “If you are going to dance with someone, you have to keep up with them. You have to dance with them. That is what Guerrero has to do, but I don’t know if he can do it.”

Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Robert Guerrero

I will be at Shoesless Joe’s at the Fairview Mall Saturday night to watch the Mayweather vs. Geurrero fight, which is being broadcast by

Showtime. Come on to talk boxing with other fight fans and see a great fight.

 

Dumb ways to die: rail safety week

- April 30th, 2013

Greetings web denizens, heathens, zealots and the rest of you!

So I thought it was just the last week of April, but apparently its yet another “official” week. This time, rail safety week. You know, CN and the like are reminding you not to jump in front of trains. Which seems like common sense, but I’ve covered dozens of deaths of people who has stood in the path a locomotive. So apparently the reminder is necessary.

And, in the spirit of the week, I figured it was a good time to repost “Dumb Ways to Die.” Play safe around trains, ranters!

 

Local boxing coach going to sports hall of fame

- April 30th, 2013

Greetings fight fans!

Of all the sports I have ever been involved in, nothing approaches the visceral power of boxing. It is unique. What it demands of the will, what personal resources it calls upon, what it feels like, is unlike any other sport.

Unlike more popular sports like hockey and football, as it is often pointed out, the fighter is alone in the ring. Victory or defeat is up to you and you alone. No teammates can rescue you, there is no one else to blame if things go wrong other than you.

However, that doesn’t mean the fighter is isolated completely. In the 60 seconds between rounds, he gets to confer with his chief second, his corner man, who acts as medic,  strategist, counselor and life preserver.  In the few moments you have to catch your breath, your corner man will seal your cuts, straighten your broken nose, clean the blood from your face and advise you for the next round. The best corner men know exactly what to say and how to say it, grab any panic or doubt in your mind and cast it out.

During the first two fights  for the St. Catharines boxing club, my chief second was Keith Murphy. He was also my trainer for those fights. In our first outing, he was the calm voice in the corner that kept me focused on the task at hand and we did really well. In the second fight, I did not do nearly as well. My nose was broken during the second round in a fight I was losing badly. Keith keep me going so I could go out on my shield, finishing the fight stronger than I started it.

For years Murphy, who once had a small part as a corner man in the movie Cinderella Man, has been a fixture in local boxing. Training fighters young and old with a perfect mixture of patience and stridency. He, along with club manager Joe Corrigan, have raised a generation of St. Catharines boxers, often giving young boy and girls who would otherwise find themselves in trouble and outlet, a home and a haven in their gym. Writing about them in 2004, I described the pair as “Corrigan, a mountainous man with a ringmaster’s voice, and the slender, fast-talking Murphy have spent their lives immersed in boxing. The job of training their stable of fighters is unpaid and often thankless, but to walk away from the sport would be like slicing away a limb. ”

Keith will always been a integral part of the make up of any fighter that Keith ever worked with and trained. The lessons he taught us will never been forgotten.

Keith is being induced into the St. Catharines sports hall of fame for his life time of dedication to local sports. Although still a fixture at the gym, Keith cannot coach any longer as he battles multiple sclerosis. But he is ever present, always keeping an eye on the fighters from ring side.

On behalf of everyone who ever laced up gloves at the St. Catharines Boxing Club: Thank you Keith.

The unbearable stink of political fear in attack ads

- April 23rd, 2013

Greetings web denizens, heathens, zealots and the rest of you!

Do you smell it? That stench in the air, wafting it’s away down from Ottawa? The unmistakable stink of fear.

It seems that the governing Conservative Party is very, very afraid. Now, I know I am coming to the party late on this – I was off sick last week, so sue me – but it is more obvious than a rodeo clown in Victoria Secret’s fashion show that the Tories have long been unnerved by the prospect of having to go head-to-head with a Justin Trudeau lead Liberal Party in an election.

How do we know? Well, the party had a series of attack ads loaded and ready to go the moment Trudeau was named Liberal leader. No sooner than Trudeau’s arm was raised than the first ad hit the airwaves declaring the little fella a silly know-nothing with all the leadership acumen of your average gerbil.

No election is on the horizon. The Tories have a majority, so no need to fret about the a vote of non confidence or Harper giving the MPs another time out when he isn’t getting his way.

So why put so much effort in trying to define the new Liberal leader right out of the gate? It’s rather odd at first blush because I am not sure anyone really knows what to make of Trudeau yet. I sure don’t.

It is not just that he is untried as a leader. I have no idea what the guy stands for. Or what his vision of the country is. Or where he would go on a host of policy issues. Nothing about Trudeau has ever left an impression on me one way or the other, to be frank about it. He is neither too nice, nor a jerk. Some of his ideas, like his comments after the Boston Marathon bombings, are close to being right while also being damn wrong. In total, he actually leaves no impression. Love him or hate him, you could not say the same about his famous father when he was the leader of the Liberals.

So if an election was called today, it’s hard to see Trudeau  as a legit threat to Harper over the span of a campaign.

But then, I don’t think the Tories are scared of Trudeau as he is now, but as he might be given time. He’s isn’t stupid, he’s young and good looking, younger Canadians and women seem like him a lot more than they do Harper. With some seasoning, he could potentially lead a resurgent Liberals against a tired Conservative party and a crumbling NDP.  That is what the Tories fear. A new Trudeuamania that recovers the party’s losses from the NDP in Quebec and gains ground in Ontario. So the Conservatives are trying to define Trudeau with transparently silly attack ads.

I don’t know how effective they will be, though. Trudeau is enough of a cipher that I suspect the ads will roll off most Canadian’s backs. Or they could backfire, giving Trudeau attention that, if they had not released the ads, he would not have. To make grounds for his party, Trudeau needs his name out there and the no-so-subtle-school-yard mockery of the ads are doing that for him for free. Plus, Canadians have grown weary of attack ads. The ones the Tories rolled out against Michael Ignatieff before the last election had less to do with the Liberals crushing defeat than did Ignatieff himself, who pushed the Liberals too far left, had all the personal warmth of  an angry barracuda, and held strangely sloppy policy ideas.

In any case, expect to smell the stench of fear, and more attack ads, for a while longer.

The Stupid, it burns: Superhero shirts are sexist edition

- April 15th, 2013

Greetings web denizens, heathens, zealots and the rest of you!

Grant Rant Fact: I’m a geek. It’s just the way it is. Yes, I box, I was a varsity football football player and I am the closet thing this burg has to Clark Kent (see what I mean?), but deep down in my soul beats the heart of the geek.

I was a sick a lot as a kid, and spent a ridiculous amount of time reading, well, pretty much anything I could get my hands on. Novels. Magazines. Text books. Comic books.

Superheroes in particular appealed to me, probably for the same reasons they appeal to most kids. But there were two things that always puzzled me. Why did so many male superheroes wear their underwear over their pants (a trend that has, mercifully come to an end for the most part) and why was it that that most female superheroes fought crime in their swim suits? (A trend that has not changed at all.)

Look, I get that superheroes are fantasy and wish fulfillment, and as such, the heroes themselves are hyper idealized depictions of the human form. So the men are ridiculously muscled and square jawed. The women are ridiculously sexy in appearance. I’m not a prude, I just don’t get why Wonder Woman can’t have a shirt or, you know, pants.line2-29-10-620x418

(Actually she did at one point recently, when her outfit was redesigned to keep it’s original flavour, but gave her pants and a jacket. Fanboy outcry was insane. Apparently, it makes total sense to many of my fellow geeks that a woman would fight crime in a one-piece and go-go boots.)

Still, ridiculous costumes aside, the world of superheroes at least boasts rosters of powerful female characters, who generally speaking, kick all kinds of ass. As a general rule, they don’t need rescuing or a man to prop up their self worth. Most of them would drop kick you to the moon for suggesting it. Wonder Woman, Black Canary, Ms. Marvel, She-Hulk, Black Widow, Batgirl (particularly when written by the brilliant Gail Simone) …the list goes on.

Batgirl-Zone-002

These chumps had better have a good dental plan….

The really unfortunate thing that is that because comic readers still tend to be men (although the demographic has and is shifting all the time as more women become readers and creators), so these characters don’t get the exposure they deserve and  young girls, in particular, don’t get to see them as much as they should.

So with all that as background, particularly the “roster of powerful women characters” thing, I ask: What the hell is this? A line of Marvel Comics  t-shirts for kids has two types: one for boys, one for girls.

The one for boys, features the Avengers with the slogan, “Be a Hero.” Awesome. Positive message. Good stuff.

The one of the girls also features the Avengers, but with the slogan, “Need a hero”. Um…Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot!

Really? So boys can BE heroes but the girls NEED a hero? Not only does this send a totally wrong message to girls, it basically spits in the eye of everything female characters in Marvel comic books stands for. You don’t see stories where the Black Widow is sitting about going “I guess I could save the world single highhandedly, but what I really need is a man to do the hero thing for me so I can just look hot in my black catsuit and guns.”

This is what she tends to do instead:


“Needs a hero”???? It’s just so….gah! Come on! It’s 2013! Did I mention it’s 2013?!?

Nuff’ said.

 

The stupid it burns: Dating advice online edition

- April 1st, 2013

Greetings web denizens, heathens, zealots and the rest of you!

Although I do not believe in a god per se (although I occasionally consider becoming a Thorist, only because I would get to carry around a sweet hammer and take Thursday’s off work) I do sometimes think the universe itself has something of a mind of its own. And that mind is mostly bent on playing jokes on sentient creatures. You know, black holes, colliding stars and ensuring the internet if home to some really, flaming hot burning stupid.

Lately, for reasons that escape me, the interweb appears to be hell bent on giving me advice to talk to women. Not saying I, like every other living male on the planet, couldn’t use the help, but even as a dumb Y chromosome, I know the burning stupid when I see it.

By way of a for instance, I encountered one the other day on Facebook that suggested one should not look at a woman’s eyes when talking to her, but instead stare at her mouth. Because instead of being super creepy, that will make her want to have sex with you. And by “have sex with you” I think the author probably meant, “flee from you and possibly considering a restraining order.”

Today’s sample, linked to the bottom of a new article I reading about public health in the United States (because, you know, these are related subjects) was 15 tips for men on how to talk to women. So, as a thought experiment, I decided to take the advice seriously and literally as though one was on a first date.

1) “You should talk about “emotional” topics like childhood memories, future ambitions, or her passions”

“Oh, one of my most powerful childhood memories is that time my cousin was chewed up by that combine harvester. It was a sad day. In the future, I want to lead a revolution to destroy all combine harvesters, for they are evil tools of the devil. Are you passionate about cheese?”

2) Women want a guy who is not afraid to lead her. While talking to a woman take control of the conversation. Never wait for her to dictate what you’ll be talking about.

“We WILL talk about combine harvesters. What? You want to talk about your job? pfffttt. I’m the man and I am dictating we talk about combine harvesters, woman!”

3) Pay attention to the non-verbal cues a woman is giving you. If you’re standing too close to her, accidentally spitting when you talk, or making her feel uncomfortable in any way… she will send you hints. Pay attention to them.

“You keep pushing me back and spraying perfume in my mouth…are you trying to send me a non-verbal clue?”

4) Remember this motto “Fun not Funny.” Women are attracted to men who allow them to have fun. Don’t concentrate on having the funniest jokes.

“Since my cousin was chewed up by that combine harvester, I don’t have the funniest jokes. but I am fun. Let’s go play ‘ride down this hill in a car with no breaks.’ It’s a thrill ride, let me tell you.”

5) Tease women. One of the easiest ways to take a conversation to a fun and flirty level is to begin to tease women. Think back to your time on the playground. In the world of dating… what worked on the playground is effective all over again.

“Hmmm…you are using that non verbal clue of pushing me again. I was only flirting when I pulled your hair like that….like a kid on the playground…huh, you are balling up your fist…another non-verbal clue?”

6) Get intimate with her. Women are turned on by men who are not afraid to take a conversation to a personal, intimate level.

“I am not afraid to talk about my cousin and the combine harvester. Lets have sex.”

7) Use things like “cold reads” to turn women on. Women love to hear opinions about themselves. Tell her what you observe about her.

“By the state of your shoes, ridiculously expensive purse, leather pants and over done finger nails, I deduce you are a stuck up princess who thinks that money and expensive things solve problems and give meaning to your otherwise shallow existence. Also, your body language gives away the fact that you don’t like a guy with onion breath…but please put that perfume away. Are you turned on my observations of you? Lets have sex.”

8) Avoid complimenting a woman too much. Women are turned off by men who come across as “needy.” If you are complimenting a woman too much she will think you’re trying to impress her. Which will have the opposite effect.

“You’re mildly OK, looking.”

9) If you want to know how to talk to women in a way that doesn’t bore them… Avoid asking too many “interview” style questions.  Instead state your opinion about things.

“I hate combine harvesters. They are evil.”

10) Remember: Statements over questions. Instead of saying “where did you grow up?” Say “You don’t look like you grew up around here.” This allows you to make observations about her and express your personality.

“You don’t look like you have any level of higher education.”

11) Don’t hide your identity.

“I’m Batman.”

12) Never compliment her on her eyes, looks, or body.

“I have no relevant opinion on your eyes, looks or body. But that woman over there is smokin’.”

13) Say something that lets her know that you view her in a “sexual” way.

“Lets have sex.”

14)  Use conversation “games” to keep the mood fun and flirtatious. Games can be anything like “truth or dare” or to less extreme games like the “5 questions game”.

“Let’s play truth or dare, because that isn’t totally creepy on a first date when you are nearing 40….”

15) Don’t give away your hand so fast. Women like men who are a challenge. If you want to keep a woman’s interest she has to feel like she is slowly winning you over. If she thinks you’re too easy… she’ll lose interest.

“I’m Batman.”

—–

So there you have it. The Grant Rant guide to talking to women based on advice from the internet. Just follow that pattern and you are sure to find the woman of your dreams, boys….or a black eye and a few busted teeth. You know, whichever comes first.

 

 

Grant Rant Extra! Back Bench Revolt edition

- April 1st, 2013

Greetings web denizens, heathens, zealots and the rest of you!

So today we have a bit of a Grant Rant extra. I had written a Grant Rant column about the back bench revolt in Ottawa, but that column was put aside after the news that long time Welland MPP Peter Kormos had died. I wrote a column about Peter instead as part of our indepth coverage of the passing of a local political titan.

Here, however, is the Grant Rant about the back bench revolt. Enjoy. Comment. Criticize:

Oh we all could see this coming, couldn’t we? Sooner or later, Prime Minister Stephen Harper would have to face a backbench revolt. And it’s finally happened.

Last week saw some backbench Tory MPs — not including St. Catharines MP Rick Dykstra, who is really more of a middle bencher than a backbencher — get a bit frothy around the mouth while complaining about being muzzled when they want to raise issues that are important to them and their constituents.

Well, of course they are being muzzled! Look, the Liberals and Tories have been whipping governing MPs into a monolithic voting machine since the Trudeau administration. Harper has just refined it to a science. It’s a party with a PhD in control freakology.

Mind you, Harper sort of has to. He has a public safety minister who survives on a steady diet of shoe leather (Remember, to argue with him is to side with child rapists) and he has a defence minister who once said that any debate over the purchase of new fighter jets put the lives of Canadians soldiers on the ground in Afghanistan in jeopardy. Hyperbole thy name is MacKay!

And those are ministers. If Harper wants to run a tight ship, I can’t totally blame the guy.

Still, the backbenchers do make a point, don’t they? After all, we elect MPs to represent our communities, not plug themselves into the government’s hive mind. They do have a right to free speech, even in the House of Commons. Maybe, especially in the House in the Commons.

But, the motives of the backbench revolters are not so pure. It appears limited to that segment of the Tory caucus who want to repeal abortion rights in Canada, using faith as a justification.

I can hear what you are saying already: “Oh, Grant, you magnificent heathen bullhorn, are you going on about religion again?” Much to my eternal distress, no. Only pointing out that this particular group is less concerned with free speech than it is with a particular issue. The group of MPs aren’t complaining when the vote on the budget or national defence is whipped are they?

And while Harper has allowed his caucus to vote their conscience on some issues, the abortion thing is a landmine he knows well enough to avoid.

Canadians are, by and large, comfortable with our abortion laws. Yes, there are protests and pastors who argue against it, but it’s not a pressing issue in this country. And, by and large, Canadians take a dim view of any politician who wants to roll the clock back.

Harper is ultimately a pragmatist. He knows the Tories would be banished into the political wilderness if he tried to make abortion illegal. Which is what these backbenchers want.

Still, I cannot help but feel Harper is reaping what he sowed by so tightly controlling the party message. Part of the contemporary Conservative party grew out of the old Reform party, which didn’t like being told what it could or not say. Trying to keep them quiet is like crushing a tube of toothpaste in your mitts. Everything will just squish out through your fingers.