<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Lilley’s Pad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad//comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad</link>
	<description>Thoughts and opinions from a seasoned reporter on Parliament Hill</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 05:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sick, twisted, bastard by Larry Bennett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/general/sick-twisted-bastard/comment-page-1/#comment-84141</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 05:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/?p=52681#comment-84141</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t want to frighten anyone here, but has anyone considered that a generation and then some, that has never been taught of the existence of a God, or seen the inside of a church or opened a bible, or even been taught the Golden Rule, or heard the Sermon on the Mount, just might be empty shells just waiting to be filled by a malevolent entity?  Too preachy?  Okay, carry on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t want to frighten anyone here, but has anyone considered that a generation and then some, that has never been taught of the existence of a God, or seen the inside of a church or opened a bible, or even been taught the Golden Rule, or heard the Sermon on the Mount, just might be empty shells just waiting to be filled by a malevolent entity?  Too preachy?  Okay, carry on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did Barbara Hall change the law while no one was looking? by Gary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/general/did-barbara-hall-change-the-law-while-no-one-was-looking/comment-page-1/#comment-84111</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/?p=52571#comment-84111</guid>
		<description>I have a HRC case about to go to hearing, and my main Complaint to the Ombudman&#039;s Office is that the HRC violated my Sec .13 Charter Rights . There was also the matter where my case was dragged out but i found some photos of Barbara Hall selling the Human-Rights Awards By-proxy when she was seen with the Corporation I have filed against for my Huamn Rights violation as a disabled person .  The same year i was Terminate from work after a workplace Injury and on Disability about to return to my job, Hall gave my employer the Human Rights Award for the best workplace that met the HRC&#039;s standards.
    I have alerted the Tribunal of my protests and provided the pix of Hall at a Human Rights fund-raiser for gay-Rights and AIDS support, i did this and opined that I DID NOT expect Hall to act in a unbias manner and Defend MY Rights over her Buddies at the Corporation that fired me while on sick-leave and then refused me Severance for 6 years now to where I&#039;m broke and still sick.

    Selling Human Rights awards should be illegal and a serious crime because it buys Favour at the Hearings and asets up a negative bias if the Complaint comes from any Employee from those Firms that bought Hall&#039;s Awards with Gay Funding and PRIDE donations or endirsements.
  They hate me right now, but i want to  drive a wooden stake into the heart of this useless anti  Human Rights  money-pit that picks who gets what Rights and who can get Compensation if the meet the Minority yardstick like Muslims and Gays right now .  Terrorism works so , they don&#039;t have to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a HRC case about to go to hearing, and my main Complaint to the Ombudman&#8217;s Office is that the HRC violated my Sec .13 Charter Rights . There was also the matter where my case was dragged out but i found some photos of Barbara Hall selling the Human-Rights Awards By-proxy when she was seen with the Corporation I have filed against for my Huamn Rights violation as a disabled person .  The same year i was Terminate from work after a workplace Injury and on Disability about to return to my job, Hall gave my employer the Human Rights Award for the best workplace that met the HRC&#8217;s standards.<br />
    I have alerted the Tribunal of my protests and provided the pix of Hall at a Human Rights fund-raiser for gay-Rights and AIDS support, i did this and opined that I DID NOT expect Hall to act in a unbias manner and Defend MY Rights over her Buddies at the Corporation that fired me while on sick-leave and then refused me Severance for 6 years now to where I&#8217;m broke and still sick.</p>
<p>    Selling Human Rights awards should be illegal and a serious crime because it buys Favour at the Hearings and asets up a negative bias if the Complaint comes from any Employee from those Firms that bought Hall&#8217;s Awards with Gay Funding and PRIDE donations or endirsements.<br />
  They hate me right now, but i want to  drive a wooden stake into the heart of this useless anti  Human Rights  money-pit that picks who gets what Rights and who can get Compensation if the meet the Minority yardstick like Muslims and Gays right now .  Terrorism works so , they don&#8217;t have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Planned Parenthood busted over sex-selective abortion once again by Gary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/general/planned-parenthood-busted-over-sex-selective-abortion-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-84091</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 01:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/?p=52861#comment-84091</guid>
		<description>Not sure what the fuss is about because about 5 years ago i tried to wrn people about a  &quot;Designer-Family&quot;  clinic in Toronto that used the DNA to be tested for the chances of a gender as to space your children with the right sex of the child to provide sisters and brothers in a certain order.
  When I rang the bell about &quot;gender-cide&quot; abortions from this Clinics DNA results to abort the pregancy, nobody cares , plus, I was called a  knuckle-dragging misogynist bigot that was anti-choice because I hated women and didn&#039;t want any abortions.
  So now we have overt gender-cides that will follow with &quot;Homo-cide&quot; Abortions once the gay-gene is found in the DNA chain. We already allow the murdewring of down-syndrome babies at a rate of 85% plus because they are a &quot;Burden&quot; or will suffer in life and it&#039;s better to kill them now.
   The feminists and gays that marched on droves for &quot;Choice&quot; will rue that day when Abortions are used to stop them from ever being born, and one day they will see their   Kind die-off from old age to become extinct 
as eugenics rears its ugly face with the blessing of McGuinty and Liberals to prevent unwanted babies that BURDEN welfare and health care costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what the fuss is about because about 5 years ago i tried to wrn people about a  &#8220;Designer-Family&#8221;  clinic in Toronto that used the DNA to be tested for the chances of a gender as to space your children with the right sex of the child to provide sisters and brothers in a certain order.<br />
  When I rang the bell about &#8220;gender-cide&#8221; abortions from this Clinics DNA results to abort the pregancy, nobody cares , plus, I was called a  knuckle-dragging misogynist bigot that was anti-choice because I hated women and didn&#8217;t want any abortions.<br />
  So now we have overt gender-cides that will follow with &#8220;Homo-cide&#8221; Abortions once the gay-gene is found in the DNA chain. We already allow the murdewring of down-syndrome babies at a rate of 85% plus because they are a &#8220;Burden&#8221; or will suffer in life and it&#8217;s better to kill them now.<br />
   The feminists and gays that marched on droves for &#8220;Choice&#8221; will rue that day when Abortions are used to stop them from ever being born, and one day they will see their   Kind die-off from old age to become extinct<br />
as eugenics rears its ugly face with the blessing of McGuinty and Liberals to prevent unwanted babies that BURDEN welfare and health care costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Global gun registry by Eric Vehkalahti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/byline/global-gun-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-84061</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Vehkalahti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 00:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/?p=52451#comment-84061</guid>
		<description>Gun Control proposed by the UN What a joke they cannot even enforce the ridiculous laws they have now.  They could give the task of control to the nuke group who has had all the success with Iran</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gun Control proposed by the UN What a joke they cannot even enforce the ridiculous laws they have now.  They could give the task of control to the nuke group who has had all the success with Iran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pulling back the pogey by Constantin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/byline/pulling-back-the-pogey/comment-page-1/#comment-84051</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/?p=52651#comment-84051</guid>
		<description>I would agree that EI meets the wicki-definition of a welfare social program.  The problem is that its unequal implementation (which, by the way, is unique among programs coming from the same source) turns it into a hidden but significant regional redistribution scheme.  That is no loger an individual welfare issue, but a matter of public policy that causes regional inequities and economic stagnation.  From this perspective is entirely irrelevant whether the progarm is &quot;leeking red ink&quot; or not.  My biggest concern continues to be its impact on development through its unequal implementation accross the land.  The new legislation hardly scratches the surface of that.  It is simly trying to add a minimal (possibly ineffective) amount of coercion to accept jobs, but the one hour commute distance proviso is meaningless.  I was all excited about the initiative to tackle the negative incentives and the parasitic exploitation by seasonal businesses and employees, but find that it was all a storm in a tea kettle.  I fail to understand how a redistribution social welfare program that can easily be incorporated into a seasonal enterprise&#039;s business plan wojuld be acceptable to you, Mr. Elder.  Although certain family relationships conditions are supposed to apply, many seasonal businesses in Nova Scotia and NFLD employ family members.  The period of &quot;employment&quot; manisfests an uncanny flexibility in adapting exactly to the small minimum EI eligibility criteria variations that happen over time.  Admittedly, this direct government subsidy prevents some migration, but is this really what this program was meant to achieve? Seriously? We live in a world were bloated governments overspend the GDP of their countries and think it acceptable for them to stay involved in keeping afloat businesses incapable of supporting themselves?  A natural balance that made those incapable of taking care of themselves a minority, has been reversed.  Look at the number of Americans receiving food stamps.  Whatever it takes we have to encourage self-suficiency and return to a system that assists only those truly in need.  Think &quot;Greece&quot; and slash the &quot;pogey&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree that EI meets the wicki-definition of a welfare social program.  The problem is that its unequal implementation (which, by the way, is unique among programs coming from the same source) turns it into a hidden but significant regional redistribution scheme.  That is no loger an individual welfare issue, but a matter of public policy that causes regional inequities and economic stagnation.  From this perspective is entirely irrelevant whether the progarm is &#8220;leeking red ink&#8221; or not.  My biggest concern continues to be its impact on development through its unequal implementation accross the land.  The new legislation hardly scratches the surface of that.  It is simly trying to add a minimal (possibly ineffective) amount of coercion to accept jobs, but the one hour commute distance proviso is meaningless.  I was all excited about the initiative to tackle the negative incentives and the parasitic exploitation by seasonal businesses and employees, but find that it was all a storm in a tea kettle.  I fail to understand how a redistribution social welfare program that can easily be incorporated into a seasonal enterprise&#8217;s business plan wojuld be acceptable to you, Mr. Elder.  Although certain family relationships conditions are supposed to apply, many seasonal businesses in Nova Scotia and NFLD employ family members.  The period of &#8220;employment&#8221; manisfests an uncanny flexibility in adapting exactly to the small minimum EI eligibility criteria variations that happen over time.  Admittedly, this direct government subsidy prevents some migration, but is this really what this program was meant to achieve? Seriously? We live in a world were bloated governments overspend the GDP of their countries and think it acceptable for them to stay involved in keeping afloat businesses incapable of supporting themselves?  A natural balance that made those incapable of taking care of themselves a minority, has been reversed.  Look at the number of Americans receiving food stamps.  Whatever it takes we have to encourage self-suficiency and return to a system that assists only those truly in need.  Think &#8220;Greece&#8221; and slash the &#8220;pogey&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sick, twisted, bastard by Stephen Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/general/sick-twisted-bastard/comment-page-1/#comment-83931</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/?p=52681#comment-83931</guid>
		<description>Sean Adams says: 

WOW and I thought my comment was silly!  It&#039;s the John Howard Society BTW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean Adams says: </p>
<p>WOW and I thought my comment was silly!  It&#8217;s the John Howard Society BTW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Planned Parenthood busted over sex-selective abortion once again by Bill Elder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/general/planned-parenthood-busted-over-sex-selective-abortion-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-83911</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Elder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/?p=52861#comment-83911</guid>
		<description>The cold hearted face of social Darwinist eugenics.  Somewhere Tommy Douglas is feeling pride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cold hearted face of social Darwinist eugenics.  Somewhere Tommy Douglas is feeling pride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pulling back the pogey by Bill Elder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/byline/pulling-back-the-pogey/comment-page-1/#comment-83901</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Elder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/?p=52651#comment-83901</guid>
		<description>Brian: If this Harper initiative to return EI revenues to the system from general coffers is a fact I stand most humbly corrected. I was unaware of this. Given this new info, I’m still unaware that the EI system is leaking any significant red ink compared to other Fed-run not-for-profit public programs. If this is a persistent condition, I put it down to abnormal circumstance and premium inadequacy. 

Had the EI fund been managed as per the law (despite court rulings I feel those who broke the law to misdirect EI funds should be doing jail time) there would be a buffer there to get the system past temporary high use periods. I’m thinking that selling off a good chunk of a state owned albatross (like CBC perhaps) could be directed toward replacing the stolen EI fund buffer.

If Harper can restructure EI to be the self-sufficient program it was before it was pillaged, I tip my hat to him. However the Harperites have never been very savvy about communicating what they are doing to the public, which would account for my misunderstanding of their motives and progress. Without making it clear to the public exactly what is being done, and why, the opposition will have a duck shoot with them over “tampering with an entitlement”.

BTW: EI IS a social welfare program, not an insurance plan because –

A)It has no profit motive/mandate, no actuarials determining premiums, no private shareholders and no private supplemental capitalization

B)It is a guaranteed state entitlement by law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian: If this Harper initiative to return EI revenues to the system from general coffers is a fact I stand most humbly corrected. I was unaware of this. Given this new info, I’m still unaware that the EI system is leaking any significant red ink compared to other Fed-run not-for-profit public programs. If this is a persistent condition, I put it down to abnormal circumstance and premium inadequacy. </p>
<p>Had the EI fund been managed as per the law (despite court rulings I feel those who broke the law to misdirect EI funds should be doing jail time) there would be a buffer there to get the system past temporary high use periods. I’m thinking that selling off a good chunk of a state owned albatross (like CBC perhaps) could be directed toward replacing the stolen EI fund buffer.</p>
<p>If Harper can restructure EI to be the self-sufficient program it was before it was pillaged, I tip my hat to him. However the Harperites have never been very savvy about communicating what they are doing to the public, which would account for my misunderstanding of their motives and progress. Without making it clear to the public exactly what is being done, and why, the opposition will have a duck shoot with them over “tampering with an entitlement”.</p>
<p>BTW: EI IS a social welfare program, not an insurance plan because –</p>
<p>A)It has no profit motive/mandate, no actuarials determining premiums, no private shareholders and no private supplemental capitalization</p>
<p>B)It is a guaranteed state entitlement by law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Planned Parenthood busted over sex-selective abortion once again by Britney</title>
		<link>http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/general/planned-parenthood-busted-over-sex-selective-abortion-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-83851</link>
		<dc:creator>Britney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/?p=52861#comment-83851</guid>
		<description>Ha. You are taking an article from a pro-life website. A website with the target of making people against abortion and abortion illegal. Come up with a new source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha. You are taking an article from a pro-life website. A website with the target of making people against abortion and abortion illegal. Come up with a new source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on COLUMN: Levant &#8211; Barack on the Choom Gang by Bill Elder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/contributor-columns/column-levant-barack-on-the-choom-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-83841</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Elder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/?p=52821#comment-83841</guid>
		<description>Obama is indeed a shadowy figure with a shadowy history. Yes the media cover for him, yes he came from virtual obscurity to the presidency on an alrming short period of time, with an alarming consolidation of political and financial power backing him.

The real question is not WHO is he but, who has paved the way by opening all the right doors, paying DNC for his leadership, buying astroturf support, buying off media scrutiny of his past - all for a virtual unknown inexperienced, untried candidate to the top power position in the world, and WHY? 

Look at his record in office and ask Qui Bono. There you will find your answers. What is the ONLY sector in America to prosper during his overseeing od US economic melt down? - Development industry? Energy sector? workers? Small business? Manufacturing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is indeed a shadowy figure with a shadowy history. Yes the media cover for him, yes he came from virtual obscurity to the presidency on an alrming short period of time, with an alarming consolidation of political and financial power backing him.</p>
<p>The real question is not WHO is he but, who has paved the way by opening all the right doors, paying DNC for his leadership, buying astroturf support, buying off media scrutiny of his past &#8211; all for a virtual unknown inexperienced, untried candidate to the top power position in the world, and WHY? </p>
<p>Look at his record in office and ask Qui Bono. There you will find your answers. What is the ONLY sector in America to prosper during his overseeing od US economic melt down? &#8211; Development industry? Energy sector? workers? Small business? Manufacturing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

