Archive for the ‘American politics’ Category

MSNBC host doubles down on claim kids belong to the collective

- April 9th, 2013

Melissa Harris-Perry, the Tulane University professor and MSNBC host shocked many parents with her ad claiming children belong to the collective.

I played the ad and talked about it yesterday with Andrea Mrozek from the Institute for Marriage and Family. You can watch that below but also make sure you scroll through to see how Harris-Perry has doubled down.

Claiming she has taken plenty of heat for her views, which I do not doubt, Harris-Perry says she has no intention to back away from her statement or apologize.

One thing is for sure: I have no intention of apologizing for saying that our children, all of our children, are part of more than our households, they are part of our communities and deserve to have the care, attention, resources, respect and opportunities of those communities.

From there Harris-Perry goes on to describe what she meant by saying, “kids belong to whole communities” is that people volunteer. She describes how she learned this.

I learned it from my mother who, long after her own kids were teens, volunteered on the non profit boards of day care centers that served under-resourced children.

I learned it from my father who, despite a demanding career and a large family of his own, always coached boys’ basketball teams in our town.

I learned it from my third-grade public school teacher, who gave me creative extra work and opened up her classroom to me after school so that I wouldn’t get bored and get in trouble.

If I thought for a minute that this is what Melissa Harris-Perry meant then I would own up to that and apologize to her right now. But I don’t.

Take a look at what this woman said.

“We have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families and recognize that kids belong to whole communities.”

She is not saying communities come together and volunteer to build a community, she is saying children are collective property. Get past the notion that children are property first and then let’s deal with the collective.
One look at Harris-Perry’s academic work or her stances on several issues show this woman to be a staunch defender of the modern American leftist ideals.

Ms. Perry, you may not want to come in a scoop up your other people’s children. That is a straw man argument set up by your supporters. But you do want greater state control over children, that much is clear.

As I’d say to anyone advocating that, back off.

CPAC video round-up

- March 16th, 2013

The Conservative Political Action Conference is wrapping up today in Maryland. Sun News has been there for the last three days covering the biggest gathering of American Conservatives.

Below are some of the great speeches you may have missed.

Lt. Col. Allen West

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio

U.S. Senator Rand Paul

Panel on Benghazi and its aftermath

Texas Governor Rick Perry

NRA’s Wayne LaPierre

VIDEO: Mitt Romney’s first interview since losing the election

- March 4th, 2013

He’s been out of the spotlight since losing the presidential election last November. On Sunday, Fox News aired the first major interview since the campaign ended.

COLUMN: Shapiro – The GOP’s internal wars

- February 6th, 2013

Rove Vs. the Tea Party

by Ben Shapiro

During the 2012 election cycle, Tea Partiers were told by their supposed betters that their ignorance of everyday politics meant that they should take a back seat to the Republican Party establishment. Brandishing the so-called Buckley Rule with quasi-religious fervor — the notion that Republicans should run the most conservative candidate who can win — the establishment GOP proclaimed that the onlypresidential candidate who could win was Republican Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts. They suggested that four-term former Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson was a shoe-in for the Senate. They explained that the Tea Party was responsible for failed Senate candidates like Todd Akin (false) and Richard Mourdock (true).

They knew best.

The only trouble was, they didn’t.

Read the rest here…

The fiscal cliff deal that isn’t a solution at all

- January 1st, 2013

Think the sniping and deal making over America’s “fiscal cliff” is all over? Think again.

The “cliff” bill may have passed the House 257 to 167 with mostly Democratic support but this fight is far from over.

Despite headlines that claim this bill will avert certain doom and that taxes will go up on the rich, disaster still looms and taxes will go up for most households.

“The budget deal passed by the U.S. Senate today would raise taxes on 77.1 percent of U.S. households, mostly because of the expiration of a payroll tax cut, according to preliminary estimates from the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center in Washington.”

The deal also doesn’t cut spending but instead adds $4 trillion in spending over the next decade according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.

Don’t worry though, everyone is doing their fair share. Hollywood is getting an extension on their tax breaks, so is NASCAR and algae growers, rum producers and electronic motorcycle manufacturers also get a break.

This deal also will see $41 in tax hikes for every $1 in spending cuts, and of course the spending cuts are outpaced by all that new spending in the bill, some $330 billion in new spending.

tax increase vs spending

If anyone doubts that America has a spending problem then they need to look at the image below which comes from the business website Zero Hedge. The red line is the annual deficit which currently stands at more than $1 trillion while the green line stands for the just over $62 billion in expected new tax revenue each year. Click through on the link to get the full perspective.

Over the next few weeks we will see more arguments about what more needs to be done. The automatic spending cuts known as “sequestration” have been put off for two months and so we will see a return to brinksmanship once the new Congress is sworn in.

John Boehner, the House Speaker, had offered President Barack Obama a deal that would have generated more tax income simply by closing loopholes and special tax deals. Obama rejected that insisting that tax rates had to go up.

Why would Obama say tax rates had to go up?

To Obama higher tax rates are a matter of fairness, even when increasing those rates might mean less money for the government. He has said it more than once including during a debate moderated by ABC’s Charlie Gibson. In questioning Obama, Gibson pointed out that the government has taken in more revenue from capital gains taxes when the tax rates have been cut as compared to when they were raised.

“Well, Charlie, what I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness,” Obama said.

Obama is an ideologue who sees high taxes and high spending as morally sound, it is central to his agenda and his identity. If you listen to the rest of his answer to Gibson back in 2008, Obama said that you don’t increase spending without finding cuts elsewhere to pay for them.

He didn’t do that here and he won’t do that when the next deal comes.

America is in a sorry state today.