Archive for the ‘Contributor Columns’ Category

COLUMN: Lilley – Scandal in Commons and Senate

- May 24th, 2013

 

Code of silence crosses party lines

by Brian Lilley

Is there anyone left on Parliament Hill with clean hands?

Canadians have been treated to a daily parade of outraged MPs fuming over the Senate expense scandal. Demands for audits followed by demands for more answers on edited reports, secret deals, resignations and a cheque issued by the prime minister’s chief of staff to then-Conservative Sen. Mike Duffy.

All the while MPs have known about abuse in their own ranks and remained silent. Read more…

COLUMN: Gunter – Qualified praise for Christy Clark’s win

- May 17th, 2013

Clark’s victory good news, sort of

by Lorne Gunter

Good for B.C. Liberal leader and Premier Christy Clark on her surprising (and overwhelming) election victory. Despite every pollster and pundit (including me) predicting her political extinction, Clark won with personal energy and determination, coupled with an appeal to voters’ interest in economic growth.

(A little reminder here and there of how disastrous past NDP governments have been didn’t hurt, either.) Clark’s win is good news for B.C. and the country. Read more…

COLUMN: Blizzard – Public teachers meddling in Catholic schools

- May 16th, 2013

ETFO should butt out of Catholic school gay-straight alliance stance

by Christina Blizzard

Why is the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario (ETFO) meddling in the affairs of Catholic schools?

They don’t represent Catholic teachers.

That union is the Ontario English Catholic Teachers’ Association (OECTA) — so what gives with ETFO president Sam Hammond putting out a news release Thursday slamming two Toronto Catholic school trustees’ move to have Gay-Straight Alliances banned from Catholic schools? Read more…

COLUMN: Duhaime – Mulcair’s flip flops on energy

- May 16th, 2013

NDP leader needs to flip-flop — again — or risk sinking in oilsands

by Eric Duhaime

NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair keeps sinking in quicksand on the oilsands issue.

Two months ago, the leader of the official opposition was accused of treason when he visited Washington, D.C., and publicly criticized the TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline, a 1,800-km pipeline project that could ship 830,000 barrels a day of bitumen from Alberta’s oilsands to Texan refineries.

While U.S. President Barack Obama is expected to decide the fate of the pipeline in the near future, Mulcair’s statement made him look like someone who wanted to interfere in the American decision-making process and a traitor who backstabbed his fellow countrymen.

That controversy did not seem to teach the NDP leader a lesson. He made another faux pas this week regarding another pipeline.

Mulcair came out against Enbridge’s 9B pipeline reversal, which currently carries crude oil from West Africa and the Middle East.

A surprising move, since less than a year ago, in a speech to the Canadian Club in Toronto, Mulcair said shipping Alberta’s oil to Quebec via an existing pipeline was a “pro-business, common sense solution.”

He could have added it’s also the patriotic and ethical thing to do. However, in Repentigny, Que., on Tuesday, Mulcair flip-flopped.

He is now against the idea of reversing Line 9B between North Westover, Ont., and Montreal, Que. Why? For environmental reasons.

“There is no system of environmental regulation in Canada, with Stephen Harper. So, people have to say ‘no’ to this (pipeline reversal) because you absolutely cannot trust them (the Conservatives) to produce a result that is safe for the environment,” Mulcair said. Partisan Mulcair does not trust Canada’s environmental regulation system anymore since we have a Conservative government. That is the latest excuse used by Mulcair to try to take the NDP out of the muck.

We are not talking about building a new pipeline in this specific case, just reversing the flow. How could it provoke more spills and environmental catastrophes when it goes from west to east than east to west?

Even the Quebec separatists have not tried to use such an argument.

Isn’t it safer to carry oil in an existing pipeline than by boat on the St. Lawrence River as we currently do?

By trying to please his environmental fanatics on the left, Mulcair is thrashing about, up to his neck in sand.

Now that the NDP has

57 of the 75 seats in Quebec, he might have a hard time convincing Quebec motorists they better buy more expensive petroleum from a dictatorship in the Middle East than cheaper fuel from fellow Canadians.

It could also become difficult for the leftist leader to tell unionized workers at the refineries in the east end of Montreal that he refuses to protect and expand their industry. There now is no easy way out out of the quicksand in which the environmentalists have lured Mulcair, other than a step backward.

The NDP leader had better flip-flop one more time before he sinks for good in his own mud.

COLUMN: Lilley – To serve and restrict

- May 3rd, 2013

Beware of police diversity units that threaten rabbis

by Brian Lilley

In Canada you have free speech — at least until the authorities say you don’t — and this week one such authority used his power to trample all over that fundamental freedom.

A talk at a synagogue just north of Toronto had to be moved after a member of the “diversity unit” of the York Regional Police Force essentially threatened the rabbi in charge. The synagogue had been rented by a group called the Jewish Defence League so they could host free-speech advocate and anti-jihadist Pamela Geller.

Insp. Ricky Veerappan, one of York Region’s finest, decided he didn’t like what Geller might say so he paid a visit to Rabbi Mendel Kaplan of the Chabad Flamingo synagogue.

Kaplan is one of the chaplains of the York Regional Police, and Veerappan made it clear that if Geller appeared at the synagogue then Kaplan would lose his position.

Rabbi Kaplan’s response should have been to show Veerappan the door and remind the inspector that we live in a free country and until someone breaks the law they are innocent.

Unfortunately, he did not. He understood the implied threat and told the event organizers that the booking was cancelled.

“Some of the stuff that

Ms. Geller speaks about runs contrary to the values of York Regional Police and the work we do in engaging our communities,” Veerappan told QMI Agency.

Quite frankly inspector, you offend me but you are still in your job.

Police are supposed to enforce laws, not enforce unwritten and vague “values” of the community.

Veerappan told QMI Agency some members of the Muslim community complained to him that Geller would be speaking and he stepped in.

What Veerappan has done is assume Geller will commit a crime and acted to make sure she could not do that.

It’s not like she was planning a terrorist attack that had to be stopped, she was simply going to speak about radical Islam and jihad.

Fortunately for free speech, the organizers have found a new venue, the Toronto Zionist Centre — the talk will go on albeit outside of the jurisdiction of York Region’s values enforcers.

That a police officer threatened a rabbi if he did not cancel an event with a speaker the cop did not like should outrage everyone.

Yet outside of several blogs and some limited media coverage, such as QMI Agency and Sun News Network, the media is silent.

My friend Salim Mansur wrote to York Region Police Chief Eric Jolliffe to demand better.

Mansur started off by telling the chief that he was a Muslim and a professor of political science at the University of Western Ontario.

“I am appalled that in this day and age we continue to hear regularly how the liberal democratic tradition of Canada and the West is being systematically shredded by institutions sworn to protect it,” Mansur wrote.

And he’s right.

It’s shocking that Prof. Mansur needs to school a police chief in Canada about freedom of speech, but clearly it needs to be done.

From the recent Whatcott decision at the Supreme Court (it said even speech that is true can be hate speech) to vexatious complaints about values, free speech is under attack in Canada. If we don’t stand up and defend it, we’re going to lose it.