NDP – the party of abortion extremists

- September 25th, 2012

NDP-profile-1The NDP is now so extreme that it thinks it should be forbidden for Parliament to ever consider the issue of abortion again. That sounds like an overstatement but unfortunately, it is not.

At a news conference calling on all MPs to vote against Motion 312, which would set up a committee to study when life begins, New Democrats Nikki Ashton and Francoise Boivin said that abortion is a fundamental right that should never be infringed. Of course that’s not the case and is nothing close to what the Supreme Court said in 1988.

Here is a section of Paragraph 21 of that ruling, written by Justice Brian Dickson

I wish to reiterate that finding a violation of security of the person does not end the s. 7 inquiry. Parliament could choose to infringe security of the person if it did so in a manner consistent with the principles of fundamental justice.

 

But apparently Boivin can’t read.

From the CBC story on the issue.

“They can put words in [Justice] Bertha Wilson’s [ruling] til they’re blue in the face, but it’s a fundamental right. There’s no such thing as voting your conscience,” Boivin said.

That’s a shocking statement from an MP. Would Boivin have accepted that Parliament had spoken on marriage in the 90s as an answer to the gay marriage debate of 2003-05?

What is also striking is that the NDP, which normally claims that the Harper government is too controlling now wants to see the PM crack down to ensure no one utters a word different from his own.

As for Bertha Wilson vs Brian Dickson, pro-lifers often cite Wilson as saying this was a matter for Parliament to decide but more importantly the majority decision, written by the Chief Justice also says that. There you have it Ms. Boivin, the courts have spoken, why do you think others shouldn’t be allowed to?

 

 

Categories: Politics

Subscribe to the post

2 comments

  1. annamarie says:

    If a baby is not human until it exits the womb, then what is kicking the mother … and why do people mourn a miscarriage?

  2. Bill Elder says:

    It’s really hard to take the NDP seriously at the best of times. They have been out there circling the earth in zero gravity for so long their narrative holds similar zero gravity. They have adopted a collection of the world’s most dangerous and fallacious ideologies and they must constantly try to shut down debate of these fallacies to keep their street cred with the zombie voting base who believe their myth spinning.

    The NDP don’t want to discuss abortion because their silencing of the progress of abortive eugenics has allowed it to go so far that things like full term killing of a baby in partial birth abortion (infanticide) is routine. I can see why they would want to stifle public debate of the ugly truths of state sanctioned infanticide, the sleep walking public are probably unaware things have gotten so far out of hand.

    Never forget the NDP’s founder TC Douglas was a full blown social Darwinist who believed in eugenics (culling society of the unfit) – he had this in common with Thomas Malthus, Francis Galton, Maggie Sanger and post-modern eugenicists like JM Keynes and Adolph Hitler.

    Obviously social Darwinist population control is a genetic trait in the modern NDP who still seem to pander simplistic medical solutions to deeper social problems.

Comments are closed.