Spezza decision

- May 13th, 2014

MONTREAL _ Just getting ready to head back Ottawa.
Always good to move around in the playoffs and get a chance to speak face-to-face with NHL types, especially when the team you cover isn’t in it and you get a chance to get perspective because you’re not quite as busy with the home team.
After spending four days in this city last week and the last couple of days before Game 6, I get the sense the Senators will have a big decision to make on Jason Spezza and they have to decide by the time he’s moved at the NHL entry draft exactly what he’s worth.
The Senators want:
- A player who can help right now. Preferably a top six forward. The Senators need someone who is hard to play against.
- A young prospect. Someone who may still be in junior is fine.
- A No. 1 pick. This is optics really. It’s not a great draft but it would look good if they got that top selection back. The Senators don’t have one because they sent it to the Anaheim Ducks for Bobby Ryan last summer.
Let’s make one thing clear: This doesn’t have much to do with the relationship between Paul MacLean and Spezza. Does MacLean love Spezza? Well, MacLean would have probably liked Spezza a heck of a lot more last season if the team was winning.
This is more about both sides decidiing to move on.
A change of scenery could be good for Spezza. The Senators may have decided a different face might help. He wanted to be the captain, they made him the captain and it didn’t work out very well.
“I just don’t think they’re going to get what they think he’s worth,” said a league executive before Monday’s Boston-Montreal game at the Bell Centre.
That’s where the dilemma is for Ottawa.
This guy is a point-a-game player. He attracts a lot of attention. Spezza, in some ways, has helped Kyle Turris be successful. Take Spezza out of the mix and you don’t have that anymore.
“It’s a tough spot to be in,” said the executive. “You don’t get Jason Spezza back in any deal.”
All this will make for an interesting next six weeks.

Round 2 Picks

- May 1st, 2014

I went 6-for-8 in Round 1. Not bad. Not great. I missed Colorado and I took San Jose. Those were wrong.
Here goes for Round 2.

Boston over Montreal in 5: The only way the Habs stand a chance is to make this one go long. They have to use their speed and try to kill the Bruins that way. Montreal cannot get involved in this one physically. I also like Tuukka Rask right now. I know Carey Price has been excellent. I go with Big Z and the Bee’s.

Pittsburgh over New York in 6: The Penguins had all kinds of issues during Round 1. That’s the way it was for them last spring against the Islanders as well. This one just looks like it will be a slam dunk for the Pens to me. I don’t know why. I guess I just like Henrik Lundqvist a little better than Fleury right now.


Chicago over Minnesota in 4: I think the Hawks make short work of Minny. The Wild don’t have a Patrick Kane and Jonathan Toews. The Wild don’t have the goaltending. Corey Crawford deserves more respect. Minny might breathe a sigh of relief getting out of Round 1. Just the way I feel.

Anaheim over Los Angeles in 7: This could be epic. Love both these teams. They have great depth and might beat the heck out of each other. I just think Anaheim is ready to get it done. The big factor is Quick. He willed the Kings to victory in the last round. I don’t think there is any question about that.

I will add Don’s soon.

Don’s first pick was Bruins in 4. That’s the last text I received from him.
First, he said 5, then he changed in his mind and got into his Boston pajamas and called the sweep.

Got these from don before the Ranger game last night:
‘m also taking Rangers in six, primarily because of the goaltending. Sid keeps the Penguins around that long, probably.
The Kings are on a roll. And now so is Quick. LA over Anaheim in six
I’m taking Chicago to sweep the Wild.

Bobby could you make your picks please?


- April 16th, 2014


Boston over Detroit in 6: Tough test but I think the Wings can’t get it done. Boston will win in the end.

Pittsburgh over Columbus in 5: The Jackets are a nice story but they don’t have the talent to beat Pittsburgh.

Montreal over Tampa Bay in 6: This is Canada’s only hope. The Habs have Carey Price and Tampa is in tough.

Rangers over Philly in 6: Just not convinced the Flyers can beat New York in a six-game series.


Colorado over Minnesota in 6: The Avs are the upstarts in these playoffs. Don’t think Minny can outscore them.

Chicago over St. Louis in 6: This will be an upset. The Blues lost six straight going into the playoffs. Not good.

San Jose over LA in 7: This has the potential to be the best first round series. I’d say stay up late. Could be good.

Anaheim over Dallas in 5: Nice story that the Stars made the playoffs. Don’t see Dallas going any further.


When I made my picks in the paper, I was kinda caught off guard a bit. That explains why I have Anaheim and San Jose meeting in the Western Conference final. It can’t happen, duh.
I’m changing that to Anaheim-Chicago now … but here are my first round calls.
I hope they’re different than Bruce’s … but if it was a March Madness bracket, I’d want them to be the same as his.
Lightning does strike twice, and I’m talking about Garrioch winning college basketball pools, not Tampa.

Boston over Detroit in five.
-This actually might be a B’s sweep. Sorry Daniel Alfredsson, but while you may have signed with a team that’s better than Ottawa, you should have asked Boston to take you.

Columbus over Pittsburgh in seven
-I’m leaning with the better goaltending for the big first round upset. Along with “Bob”, the Jackets have a bunch of lunch pailers who just keep on working.

Montreal over Tampa in seven
-I’m not sure how this is going to work because if it goes the distance, those fans at the Tampa Bay Times Forum can be pretty rowdy. Seriously. Oh yeah, now I remember. Price will be the difference in Game 7.

Philadelphia over New York Rangers in five
-I’m starting to think the Flyers are this spring’s “sexy” playoff pick. So I might as well take them. I’m sexy.

Colorado over Minnesota in six
-Nobody won more games than Varlamov, and Patrick Roy will tell all those young Avalanchers a thing or two about the playoffs.

Chicago over St. Louis in four
-This is probably a dumb pick on a few different fronts. The Blues forgot how to score down the stretch, but they are still a pretty good squad. It’s also dopey of me to say they’ll be swept when, if memory serves me right, before the season started I picked them to win the Cup.

San Jose over Los Angeles in seven.
-This series will be worth staying up late for. Best matchup of the first round. At least four games go to overtime.

Anaheim over Dallas in five
-Not sure why, but I just don’t have a lot of faith in the Stars. And have Getzlaf and Perry not aged since the beat up the Senators in the 2007 finals?

Chris Neil, jam and some Penguins

- April 13th, 2014

PITTSBURGH – Pointed out to me by a friend this morning was a very interesting statistic regarding Chris Neil.
The Senators all-time penalty minutes leader has never be a single season leader in PIMs. He’s never won the NHL bad boy title. He’s been in the Top 10 nine times, and the Top 3 five times. But he has never been No. 1.
That could change today.
With one game to go, tonight at 7:30 versus the Penguins, Neil leads the league with 206 PIMs. Next in line is Vancouver’s Tom Sestito, with 203, who plays a rivalry game against the Flames at 9 p.m., and then Dallas’ Antoine Roussel, with 197, who plays against the Phoenix Coyotes also at 9 p.m.
Nobody else is close.
This is Neil’s first year as an alternate captain. He has averaged 11:47 of ice time per game, while scoring eight goals and six assists, and a minus-10 mark that is not so bad on this Senators team.
He is also seventh in the league in hits, with 249.
Neil, as always, plays the game with … what’s the word? Anyway, it’ll come to me.
Meanwhile, a few of us Ottawa media types went over to the Consol Energy Center this morning to watch the Penguins “optional” skate. Twelve players were on the ice, plus goalies Marc-Andre Fleury and Jeff Zatkoff. The start against the Senators tonight will go to Zatkoff, which means Fleury ends the season with 39 wins, second only to Colorado’s Semyon Varlamov.
Fleury wanted to get to 40, but he missed out on that chance yesterday when he gave up a very bad overtime goal to Philly’s Mark Streit.
Actually, Fleury deflected the relatively slow backhand by Streit between his own legs.
That’s what you get with The Flower. He can be very good, as the 39 wins will attest, but he can also be brutal.
I asked him if he feels as much pressure heading into the playoffs as everybody thinks. I said people believe the Penguins will go only as far into the playoffs as their goaltending will take them.
“Maybe that’s people that don’t know the game too much you know,” he said with a defensive look on his face. “I think goalies help a lot in a game, but it’s a team game and we need everybody to play well.”
Okay, but the Penguins would have more Cups now if Fleury had played better in past playoffs. Last year against the Senators, his struggles were such that he wound up on the bench as back up to Tomas Vokoun.
The Penguins are better defensively these days, and part of the credit goes to Jacques Martin, the most successful regular season coach in Senators history who is now an assistant with Pittsburgh.
Jacques hasn’t been an assistant in the NHL since he was on Colorado’s staff in 1995-96. The next year he took over the Ottawa job, and the Avalanche won the Cup.
Jacques would like to earn his first Cup ring this season with the Penguins, and he would like to become a head coach in the NHL again.
“Definitely, I’d love to get back as a head coach,” he said. “Hopefully I get an opportunity.
“This year has been a learning experience .. I think you always learn when you’re put in a different scenario, with a different organization, so I think I’d even be better prepared (to be a head coach).”
Also chatted with defenceman Brooks Orpik about playing the Columbus Blue Jackets in the first round. Columbus is Pittsburgh’s closest rival, just a 3 1/2 drive away.
As I sat on the dressing room bench beside Orpik, I noticed other reporters were looking at me, chuckling. I thought they were laughing because Orpik was uncomfortable answering my questions about Jacques, like he was unsure of what to say about the impact Martin has had.
He was like, “Jacques, Jacques …” almost as if he didn’t know who I was talking about, at first.
Then I looked down at my shirt and realized that’s not what they were laughing at. Something was on me … I thought it was a bug initially. Then I realized it was …. jam!
That’s the word I was looking for to describe Neil’s game!
Funny, the same friend who pointed out Neil’s penalty minute numbers also says I’m the Chris Neil of Ottawa sports writers. He says I go hard, I’m emotional, and I wear my heart on my sleeve.
Apparently, I also wear my breakfast on my chest. I’m impressed Orpik could keep a straight face while we chatted.
Senators didn’t have a morning skate today and there will be no availability with Paul MacLean until 5:30 or so, which means I can not tell you who will be starting in goal for them or any lineup changes they may make.
I can tell you that owner Eugene Melnyk sent out a message today inviting fans to ask him any questions they may have on Twitter, and he will answer them between 3-4 p.m. on Tuesday.
There’s already some pretty good ones for him. Check out @MelnykEugene.

The breakfast

State secrets

- April 11th, 2014

I get that the NHL is not the NFL, that hockey teams adopted the policy a few years ago of keeping people completely in the dark with regards to player injuries.
I don’t get why, I just get that it has become the accepted (by most) way of life in hockey’s biggest league.
I can almost understand why a coach would treat an injury as a state secret if he was involved in a gruelling playoff series with another team. If his top defenceman has a bad right knee, he wouldn’t want the opponents to deliberately try and make that knee worse. That could also hurt his team’s chances of winning the series.
But over the course of the regular season? Not so much. And in the case of Mika Zibanejad, I am completely befuddled.
Zibanejad left Thursday’s game against the New Jersey Devils at one point in the third period and did not return.
Afterwards, reporters naturally asked coach Paul MacLean for an update.
MacLean, who chatted with his staff for at least 20 minutes before the media availability, is always extremely coy when it comes to injuries. But on this night, his answer was embarrassing.
He said Zibanejad was taken to the hospital for “precautionary reasons.” The hospital? What happened to him?
“They couldn’t do stuff here that they could do there,” said MacLean. “That’s all I know.”
So an important, 20-year old Swede went from a game to an ambulance to a hospital, and the coach has no idea why? He didn’t ask anybody while he was standing around dissecting the game sheet? He doesn’t care?
Of course MacLean has an idea what the issue is, but rather than update the media (and the fans) he chooses to play dumb. Or lie, however you want to see it.
Heaven forbid anyone knows that Zibanejad has a concussion, or a busted shoulder, or whatever else is ailing him.
Imagine if the Toronto Maple Leafs caught wind of even the smallest details? Surely, they would use the info to their advantage in Saturday’s mammoth Battle Of Ontario – or the Battle For The Glory Of Being The Second Worst Team In The Province.
As one reporter said: “I don’t know whether to tell people to relax or be worried.”
Neither do I.
But I do know that this veil of secrecy regarding injuries is well passed the ridiculous stage.