House holds cards in Wesmen name game

- September 30th, 2012

In the 1990s and early 2000s, a handful of schools in Canadian university athletics explored and implemented nickname changes, ditching male-leaning monikers to appease interests in gender equity.

York was no longer the Yeomen, but rather the Lions. Alberta added Pandas to its Golden Bears. St. Francis Xavier went to X-Women; Acadia to Axewomen. Waterloo told its women’s teams they were Athenas and not Warriors — but then apparently realized that women, too, can be Warriors and changed it back after only a few years.

Eventually, schools quietly — with no official press releases or motions — dropped the “Lady” as prefixes to nicknames, realizing it was not only an antiquated term but also wholly unnecessary when paired with words like Dinos, Thunderbirds, Badgers, Gryphons, Huskies, and the like.uw39 The schools evidently came to the conclusion that all those things — in the real world outside of sports — could in fact be male and female and hence didn’t require a differentiation.

What an epiphany.

And so we are here in 2012, years after every other Canadian school that fell into this category made its decision on where to stand, that the University of Winnipeg picks up a discussion that had laid dormant on the downtown campus since it was first broached in the mid-’90s. Yes, the U of W believes Wesmen needs to be examined.

Perhaps.

Perhaps if there was an undeniable groundswell against the name. Perhaps if the athletes putting on the ‘W’ felt an emotion even slightly above indifference. Perhaps if alumni were up in arms over a university being slow-footed to get with the times. Perhaps if boosters were showing up in droves to protest or threaten to pull their support.

Yet, none of this would seem to be the case.

As you’ll see in the coming weeks — and likely in the coming days as I work on a piece talking to current and former U of W athletes — the overwhelming opinion of that group falls in the emotional spectrum in a range from “never even thought about it” to “keep your hands off our identity.”

A Facebook page called Save the Wesmen stirred up some of the opinions of current and former U of W students and athletes, with around 700 “Likes”.

No such “Change the Wesmen” Facebook page exists.

Jeremy Read, the senior advisor to school president Lloyd Axworthy, is the frontman on media relations in this story and has been quoted saying this has been a long-standing issue for some of the university community. Vague as the comments are — and trust they will always be in these debates that dance along the fine line of political correctness — they do give some indication where this is coming from.

If there are members of the “university community” who have long had issue with the Wesmen name, they certainly aren’t vocal members of the current athletic department. If you were to head over to Duckworth Centre and spend the afternoon in its gym and offices talking to athletes and coaches and department administrators — the very people who wear the Wesmen name and sit in the epicentre of this debate — and take a poll on the issue … well, I beg you to find me anything near a majority in favour of change.

And that’s where this thing should begin and end. Read — and he’s the only one we can pin this on since Axworthy isn’t talking and all interview requests are being funneled to his senior advisor — believes the university moving into a new facility (the on-campus fieldhouse scheduled to be open in 2014) is the perfect timing to explore such a change, which is farcical of course. The new UNITED Health and RecPlex — a completely dank, witless name that sounds like it came out of an online PR name-generator — surely is steering some of this thinking. As the university fancies and champions itself as a beacon of hope and light for Winnipeg’s inner-city, the RecPlex is at the centre of that thinking. One need only read a few paragraphs from September’s ground-breaking press release to see how carefully the school is sculpting its next moves, hitting heavy on social and political buzzwords. So with the RecPlex — and the accompanying We Are The World inclusion theme — as the backdrop, U of W is proclaiming loudly that “Wesmen” is too exclusive, yet hasn’t provided the name of a single person who thinks it is.

For as much as Read — and by extension Axworthy, I suppose — would trumpet this as a festering issue that threatens the legitimacy of the school and its athletics teams, and one that could lead to alienation, it simply isn’t. If it was, it would have been changed in the 90s when every other school in Canada was discussing similar dilemmas. If it was, it would have been explored seven years ago when U of W reinvented itself with new logos that it now stamps on every piece of merchandise it can, not to mention the Duckworth court and walls. If it was, it would have been in the public conscience and loudly debated over the years. If it was, the comment sections and social media reaction to the stories that appeared in print, and on radio and TV the past few days would have been overwhelmingly pro-change.

None of those things happened, of course, making this story seem like U of W trying to drum up publicity for itself, which it has succeeded in doing. But in terms of trotting out anything other than vague allusions to some parts of a university community, there has been little in the way of anything tangible coming from the university, leaving us all to just trust Read’s word that there are a lot of people who feel left out because of a nickname. Where? Who?

If there is in fact a quiet anti-Wesmen faction and if that group does succeed in motivating a change, the university needs to be full disclosure in the results of its consultations. This should be openly democratic, not typically post-secondary wherein the university decides and everyone else just has to follow. A simple “we’ve explored this issue and taken into account the opinions of all involved” isn’t enough and, worse yet, would fortify the already existing angst towards universities and the belief that they rarely consider the desires of anyone but their most senior administrators.

Basically, if the U of W says there’s a majority of its “university community” that wants a change, we say prove it. As educators say to students, “show your work.” And if the buzz of the last few days is any indication, Read, Axworthy, et. al, are going to have a hard time doing that.

In truth, if the University of Winnipeg is something other than the Wesmen in 2014, it will indeed be because a few people with the power to do so made a decision on their own against the will of many; telling us all it was necessary, even though a resounding number of voices exist to tell them it wasn’t.

Categories: Sports

Subscribe to the post

4 comments

  1. Keith Borkowsky says:

    Dear Dr. Axworthy,

    I am surprised to see that a representative of your office has been tasked with examining a name change for an athletics program that has represented the university proudly for decades.

    And I really don’t understand how the members of the university community – some who are historians – could have missed the origins of the Wesmen name. It was never about gender, but was the mashing together of the names of two founding colleges that eventually became the University of Winnipeg. You would easily recognize them as they are also names used for key buildings on campus: Wesley Hall and Manitoba Hall. People should learn what the word actually means before they cast aside the name a women’s basketball team were proud to use as they won 88-straight games.

    If this is simply a publicity stunt, stop it now, as this only serves to embarass the university.

    If this is actually to address a serious complaint to deal with gender equity, when can I expect the university’s call to change the name of the province? Afterall, Manitoba must be equally offensive as Wesmen. While you are at it, will you change the name of Manitoba Hall?

    Signed,

    Keith Borkowsky
    Concerned alumnus of
    The University of Winnipeg

  2. Howard mathIeson says:

    If the University is truly interested in engaging in a dialogue, I imagine we can look forward to a public forum where all groups would be able to express their views. Perhaps at the Duckworth center?

  3. Donna Write says:

    I’m gonna file this one under…

    First world problems yo!

  4. brett says:

    Have a vote, and give alumnus a vote as well.
    The place is ripe with little people with much influence, who do all of their dirty work under rocks, away from the light.
    Graduated in 1985, the place had always had politically correct nitwits. It’s important that you set some standards and traditions, tho’ King lloyd seems too busy making acquisitions for the kingdom, without teachers to teach in them, or the money to pay the staff a competitive wages.
    Nice new politically neutral philosophy

Leave a comment

 characters available